suspends the laws of nature, the law is simply expanded to include such events, therefore leaving only nonmiraculous, natural occurrences.50 Such scholars additionally argue that a miracle could not be recognized as such even if one did occur. But it must likewise be concluded that those who reject miracles based on Hume’s reasoning (including such modern renditions) must also be said to have done so invalidly. Although not following Hume’s exact arguments, there are at least three points at which
Page 44